Grand Rounds PowerPoint Week 6

Grand Rounds PowerPoint Week 6

Category Points % Description
Case Study Presentation 15 Presents a case using a fictional patient who presents to clinic with assigned medical condition. Provides detailed description of patient, including signs and symptoms of condition
Medication Management 20 Describes, in detail, the most commonly prescribed drugs for condition, including trade and generic names, typical dosages, mechanism of action, adverse effects, and major contraindications and interactions. Describes alternate therapies.
Evidence Based Support 10 Provides evidence from clinical guidelines, research-based articles, or other appropriate provider-level resources. Includes evidence from Dreischulte & Guthrie (2012) article.
Barriers to Practice 5 Describes potential barriers, issues, or problems related to disease process and prescribing, including potential issues related to cultural or socioeconomic diversity and healthcare literacy
Identifying Outcomes 5 Describe optimal outcomes after treatment with suggested medication
Test Questions 15 Includes five (5) knowledge-based questions related to presentation materials
Formatting 5 Slides are clear and easy to read. No more than 15 slides (excluding test question and reference slides) are submitted. References use APA format.
Total  75 100 A quality assignment will meet or exceed all of the above requirements.

Grading Rubric PowerPoint Presentation- Week 6

Criterion Exceptional

Outstanding or highest level of performance

Exceeds

Very good or high level of performance

Meets

Satisfactory level of performance

Needs Improvement

Poor or failing level of performance

Developing

Unsatisfactory level of performance

Content

Possible Points = 70

Case Study Presentation 15 Points 13 Points 12 Points 6 Points 0 Points
Presents a case using a fictional patient who presents to clinic with assigned medical condition. Provides detailed description of patient, including signs and symptoms of condition. Presents a case using a fictional patient who presents to clinic with assigned medical condition. Provides detailed description of patient, but omits some signs and symptoms of condition. Presents a case using a fictional patient who presents to clinic with assigned medical condition. Provides vague description of patient and omits some signs and symptoms of condition. Presents a case using a fictional patient who presents to clinic with assigned medical condition, but does not provide description of patient, including signs and symptoms of condition. Does not present a case study.
Medication Management 20 Points 18 Points 16 Points 8 Points 0 Points
Describes, in detail, the first line prescribed drugs for condition, including trade and generic names, typical dosages, mechanism of action, adverse effects, and major contraindications and interactions. Describes alternate therapies. Generally describes the first line prescribed drugs for condition, omitting one of the following: trade and generic names, typical dosages, mechanism of action, adverse effects, and major contraindications and interactions, and alternate therapies. Generally describes the first line prescribed drugs for condition, omitting 2-3 of the following: trade and generic names, typical dosages, mechanism of action, adverse effects, and major contraindications and interactions, and alternate therapies. Generally describes the first line prescribed drugs for condition, or incorrectly identifies first line drug, omitting 4 or more of the following: trade and generic names, typical dosages, mechanism of action, adverse effects, and major contraindications and interactions, and alternate therapies. Does not describe medications for condition.
Evidence-Based Support 10 Points 9 Points 8 Points 4 Points 0 Points
Provides evidence from clinical guidelines, research-based articles, or other appropriate provider-level resources. Includes evidence from Dreischulte & Guthrie (2012) article. Provides evidence from clinical guidelines, research-based articles, or other appropriate provider-level resources. Does not include evidence from Dreischulte & Guthrie (2012) article. Provides evidence from sources other than clinical guidelines, research-based articles, or other appropriate provider-level resources. Includes evidence from Dreischulte & Guthrie (2012) article. Provides evidence from sources other than clinical guidelines, research-based articles, or other appropriate provider-level resources. Does not include evidence from Dreischulte & Guthrie (2012) article. Does not provide evidence to support.
Barriers to Practice 5 Points 4 Points 3 Points 1 Point 0 Points
Describes potential barriers, issues, or problems related to disease process and prescribing, including potential issues related to cultural or socioeconomic diversity and healthcare literacy. Describes potential barriers, issues, or problems related to disease process and prescribing, but omits potential issues related to either cultural, socioeconomic diversity, or healthcare literacy. Describes potential barriers, issues, or problems related to disease process and prescribing, but omits potential issues related to two of the following: cultural, socioeconomic diversity, or healthcare literacy. Describes potential barriers, issues, or problems related to disease process and prescribing, but omits potential issues related to cultural, socioeconomic diversity, AND healthcare literacy. Does not describe potential barriers.
Identifying Outcomes 5 Points 4 Points 3 Points 1 Point 0 Points
Describe optimal outcomes after treatment with suggested medication, including expected follow up care. Describe optimal outcomes after treatment with suggested medication, does not include expected follow up care. Incorrectly identifies optimal outcomes after treatment with suggested medication, including expected follow up care. Incorrectly identifies optimal outcomes after treatment with suggested medication, does not include expected follow up care. Does not address outcomes.
15 Points 13 Points 12 Points 6 Points 0 Points
Test Questions Includes five (5) knowledge-based questions with correct responses related to presentation materials. Includes four (4) knowledge-based questions with correct responses related to presentation materials. Includes two-three (2-3) knowledge-based questions related to presentation materials

OR

Includes five (5) questions but does not include correct responses.

Includes one (1) knowledge-based question related to presentation materials. Does not include questions.
Content Subtotal of 70 points
Format

Possible Points = 5 Points

Grammar, APA Formatting, Syntax, Spelling, & Punctuation 5 Points 4 Points 3 Points 1 Point 0 Points
APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation are accurate, or with zero to one errors. Two to four errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted Five to seven errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted. More than 7 errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted Post contains ten or more errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation or repeatedly makes the same errors after faculty feedback
Format Subtotal of 75 points
Total Points of 75 points

Grand Rounds Discussion Week 7

Category Points % Description
Leading the Discussion 25 Posts PowerPoint presentation by Sunday 11:59 p.m. at the end of Week 6. Responds substantively to all peers who interact with PowerPoint presentation, and answers any faculty questions posted to discussion by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 7.
Participating in the Discussion 10 Responds substantively to at least three different peer presentations by Thursday 11:59 p.m. MT of Week 7.
Identifying best practices 20 In participation responses to presentations, discusses a drug that could be prescribed for the condition DIFFERENT than those presented. Presents an alternate treatment plan from the Walmart or Target $4 RX list, and offers reasons for the change or if the drug is not on the list, why? Uses scholarly, evidenced based references to support responses.
Responding to questions 15 Answers five (5) questions for three different presentations for a total of 15 questions.
Format 5 Compose the posts in clear, concise, and organized manner using proper APA format, grammar and syntax.
Total 75

Grading Rubric Grand Rounds Discussion- Week 7

Criterion Exceptional

Outstanding or highest level of performance

Exceeds

Very good or high level of performance

Meets

Satisfactory level of performance

Needs Improvement

Poor or failing level of performance

Developing

Unsatisfactory level of performance

Content

Possible Points = 70

Leading the Discussion 25 Points 22 Points 21 Points 10 Points 0 Points
Posts PowerPoint presentation by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT of the end of Week 6. Responds substantively to all peers who interact with PowerPoint presentation, and answers any faculty questions posted to discussion by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 7. Posts PowerPoint presentation by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT of the end of Week 6. Responds substantively to some peers who interact with PowerPoint presentation, and answers any faculty questions by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 7. Posts PowerPoint presentation by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT of the end of Week 6. Responds with limited substance to some peers who interact with PowerPoint presentation, but does not answer faculty questions by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 7. Posts PowerPoint presentation by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT of the end of Week 6. Responds to faculty questions, but does not respond to peers in own presentation discussion. Does not post PowerPoint presentation in the discussion.
10 Points 9 Points 8 Points 4 Points 0 Points
Participating in the Discussion Student responds substantively to at least three different peer presentations by Thursday 11:59 p.m. MT. Student responds substantively to at least two different peer presentations by Thursday 11:59 p.m. MT. Student responds substantively to at least three different peer presentations by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT. Student responds substantively to one peer presentation by Thursday 11:59 p.m. MT. Student does not participate; or, student responds to less than three peer presentations by after Thursday 11:59 p.m. MT.
Identifying Best Practices (Participant) 20 Points 18 Points 16 Points 8 Points 0 Points
In participation responses to presentations, discusses a drug that could be prescribed for the condition DIFFERENT than those presented. Presents an alternate treatment plan from the Walmart or Target $4 RX list, and offers reasons for the change or if the drug is not on the list, why? Uses scholarly, evidenced based references to support responses in ALL responses to presentations. In participation responses to presentations, discusses a drug that could be prescribed for the condition DIFFERENT than those presented. Presents an alternate treatment plan from the Walmart or Target $4 RX list, but does not provide reasons for the change or why the drug is not on the list. Uses scholarly, evidenced based references to support responses in at least 2 responses to presentations. In participation responses to presentations, discusses a drug that could be prescribed for the condition DIFFERENT than those presented. Does not present alternate treatment.

Uses scholarly, evidenced based references to support responses in at least 2 responses to presentations.

In participation responses to presentations, discusses a drug that could be prescribed for the condition DIFFERENT than those presented. Does not present alternate treatment. Does not provide scholarly, evidence based references. Does not provide substantive responses to peer presentations. Does not include different drugs nor provide scholarly resources.
Responding to questions (Participant) 15 Points 13 Points 12 Points 6 Points 0 Points
Answers five questions for three different presentations for a total of fifteen questions. Answers three-four questions for three different presentations for a total of nine-twelve questions. Answers three-five questions for two different presentations for a total of six-ten questions. Answers three-five questions for one presentation. Does not answer presentation questions.
Content Subtotal _____of 70 points
Format

Possible Points = 5 Points

Grammar, APA Formatting, Syntax, Spelling, & Punctuation 5 Points 4 Points 3 Points 1 Point 0 Points
APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation are accurate, or with zero to one errors. Two to four errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted. Five to seven errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted. More than 7 errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted. Post contains ten or more errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation or repeatedly makes the same errors after faculty feedback.
Format Subtotal of 5 points
Total Points of 75 points
NR508 Directions & Rubric.docx 3
SOURCE: APPROVEDSCHOLARS.COM
APPROVEDSCHOLARS – PLACE YOUR ORDER HERE: https://www.approvedscholars.com/place-order/

BEST-ESSAY-WRITERS-ONLINE

Havent found the Essay You Want?
We Can Assist
The Paper is Written from Scratch Specifically for You

Order Now

    WHY APPROVEDSCHOLARS.COM

  • Confidentiality & Authenticity Guaranteed
  • Plagiarism Free Content Guarantee
  • APPROVEDSCHOLARS Guarantee Timely Delivery of All Papers
  • Quality & Reliability
  • Papers Written from Scratch and to Your Instructions
  • Qualified Writers Only
  • APPROVEDSCHOLARS Allow Direct Contact With Your Writer
  • Using APPROVEDSCHOLARS.COM Means Keeping Your Personal Information Secure
  • 24/7 Customer Support

GET QUALITY ESSAY HELP AT: https://www.approvedscholars.com/

ORDER A PAPER WRITTEN FROM SCRATCH AND TO YOUR EXACT INSTRUCTIONS (APPROVEDSCHOLARS.COM – For 100% Original Content)

PLACE YOUR ORDER