NURS 6512 Week 4 Assignment 1 Rubric
List View
Check before you submit. Get Turnitin Score Report in 15 Minutes.
Don't risk the 'Red' score. Get the exact same Turnitin report your professor uses. Join 50,000+ students who submitted their essays with confidence this semester.
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | |
NURS 6512 Week 4 Assignment 1 Rubric Quality of Work Submitted: The extent of which work meets the assigned criteria and work reflects graduate level critical and analytic thinking. | Points: Points Range: 27 (27%) – 30 (30%)Assignment exceeds expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 75% containing exceptional breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 24 (24%) – 26 (26%)Assignment meets expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 50% containing good breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 21 (21%) – 23 (23%)Assignment meets most of the expectations. One required topic is either not addressed or inadequately addressed. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 20 (20%)Assignment superficially meets some of the expectations. Two or more required topics are either not addressed or inadequately addressed. Feedback: |
| Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to: Understand and interpret the assignment’s key concepts. | Points: Points Range: 27 (27%) – 30 (30%)Demonstrates the ability to critically appraise and intellectually explore key concepts. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 24 (24%) – 26 (26%)Demonstrates a clear understanding of key concepts. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 21 (21%) – 23 (23%)Shows some degree of understanding of key concepts. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 20 (20%)Shows a lack of understanding of key concepts, deviates from topics. Feedback: |
| Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to: Apply and integrate material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, and textbook) and credible outside resources. | Points: Points Range: 18 (18%) – 20 (20%)Demonstrates and applies exceptional support of major points and integrates 2 or more credible outside sources, in addition to 2-3 course resources to support point of view. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)Integrates specific information from 1 credible outside resource and 2-3 course resources to support major points and point of view. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)Minimally includes and integrates specific information from 2-3 resources to support major points and point of view. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 13 (13%)Includes and integrates specific information from 0 to 1 resource to support major points and point of view. Feedback: |
| Written Expression and Formatting Paragraph/Sentence Structure: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are clearly structured and carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. | Points: Points Range: 9 (9%) – 10 (10%)Paragraphs/Sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 8 (8%) – 8 (8%)Paragraphs/sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 80% of the time. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 7 (7%) – 7 (7%)Paragraphs/sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 60%- 79% of the time. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 6 (6%)Paragraphs/sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity < 60% of the time. Feedback: |
| Written Expression and Formatting English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation. | Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 3 (3%) – 4 (4%)Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 2 (2%) – 2 (2%)Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 1 (1%)Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. Feedback: |
| Written Expression and Formatting The assignment follows parenthetical/in-text citations, and at least 3 evidenced based references are listed. | Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Contains parenthetical/in-text citations and at least 3 evidenced based references are listed. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 3 (3%) – 4 (4%)Contains parenthetical/in-text citations and at least 2 evidenced based references are listed Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 2 (2%) – 2 (2%)Contains parenthetical/in-text citations and at least 1 evidenced based reference is listed Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 1 (1%)Contains no parenthetical/in-text citations and 0 evidenced based references listed. Feedback: |
Show Descriptions Show Feedback
Quality of Work Submitted: The extent of which work meets the assigned criteria and work reflects graduate level critical and analytic thinking.–
Levels of Achievement:
Excellent 27 (27%) – 30 (30%)
Assignment exceeds expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 75% containing exceptional breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics.
Good 24 (24%) – 26 (26%)
Assignment meets expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 50% containing good breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics.
Fair 21 (21%) – 23 (23%)
Assignment meets most of the expectations. One required topic is either not addressed or inadequately addressed.
Poor 0 (0%) – 20 (20%)
Assignment superficially meets some of the expectations. Two or more required topics are either not addressed or inadequately addressed.
Feedback:
Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to: Understand and interpret the assignment’s key concepts.–
Levels of Achievement:
Excellent 27 (27%) – 30 (30%)
Demonstrates the ability to critically appraise and intellectually explore key concepts.
Good 24 (24%) – 26 (26%)
Demonstrates a clear understanding of key concepts.
Fair 21 (21%) – 23 (23%)
Shows some degree of understanding of key concepts.
Poor 0 (0%) – 20 (20%)
Shows a lack of understanding of key concepts, deviates from topics.
Feedback:
Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to: Apply and integrate material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, and textbook) and credible outside resources.–
Levels of Achievement:
Excellent 18 (18%) – 20 (20%)
Demonstrates and applies exceptional support of major points and integrates 2 or more credible outside sources, in addition to 2-3 course resources to support point of view.
Good 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
Integrates specific information from 1 credible outside resource and 2-3 course resources to support major points and point of view.
Fair 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
Minimally includes and integrates specific information from 2-3 resources to support major points and point of view.
Poor 0 (0%) – 13 (13%)
Includes and integrates specific information from 0 to 1 resource to support major points and point of view.
Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting Paragraph/Sentence Structure: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are clearly structured and carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.–
Levels of Achievement:
Excellent 9 (9%) – 10 (10%)
Paragraphs/Sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity
Good 8 (8%) – 8 (8%)
Paragraphs/sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 80% of the time.
Fair 7 (7%) – 7 (7%)
Paragraphs/sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.
Poor 0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
Paragraphs/sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity < 60% of the time.
Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.–
Levels of Achievement:
Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
Good 3 (3%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
Fair 2 (2%) – 2 (2%)
Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
Poor 0 (0%) – 1 (1%)
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting The assignment follows parenthetical/in-text citations, and at least 3 evidenced based references are listed.–
Levels of Achievement:
Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Contains parenthetical/in-text citations and at least 3 evidenced based references are listed.
Good 3 (3%) – 4 (4%)
Contains parenthetical/in-text citations and at least 2 evidenced based references are listed
Fair 2 (2%) – 2 (2%)
Contains parenthetical/in-text citations and at least 1 evidenced based reference is listed
Poor 0 (0%) – 1 (1%)
Contains no parenthetical/in-text citations and 0 evidenced based references listed.
Feedback:
